Monday, July 18, 2016

Quod erat Demonstrandum

"There is no justification for violence against law enforcement."

Therefore, Our War for Independence was unjustified.

Therefore, the governments that resulted from said war are illegitimate.

Therefore, the laws promulgated by those governments might as well be orders from the Mafia.

Therefore, the enforcers of these orders are simply Mafia Thugs.

Violence against Mafia Thugs is always justified.

An Opinion in Some Places

Quoth our dear leader, "There is no justification for violence against law enforcement."

A cop once told me that in some places basic arithmetic is an opinion. And cops can never be wrong. So, if the certainty of basic arithmetic is contingent upon location, I see no reason why the certainty of the above declaration by our president should not be as well. Therefore, the claim that nothing justifies violence against the police is, just like basic arithmetic, an opinion in some places.

Saturday, July 16, 2016

An Observation

Tom Wilkinson portrayed a heterodox parish Priest who sleeps with his maid in Priest. In The Exorcism of Emily Rose he plays an extremely orthodox priest who probably regards all fornicators as possessed.

In Fifty Shades of Grey, Dakota Johnson portrays an ingĂ©nue, easily seduced into sex slavery by money and power. In Cymbeline she plays Imogen, one of Shakespeare's most resolutely chaste heroines.

Derek Jacobi is openly gay and yet appeared in the Opus Dei propaganda film, There Be Dragons.

Jane Fonda portrayed Nancy Reagan in The Butler and did a strip tease in Barbarella.

Monica Bellucci portrayed the Blessed Virgin Mary in The Passion of the Christ and played a Bond Girl in Spectre.

Keifer Sutherland opposes torture and yet starred in the long-running pro-torture propaganda television series, 24.

Actors are whores.

Saturday, July 9, 2016

The "Cotton Ceiling"

It should be noted (because the mainstream news outlets do not note this) that the LGBT Alliance is fundamentally insane because at the very core of this alliance lies a flagrant violation of the law of non-contradiction.

The T want to be treated according to their "gender identity", regardless of operative status. This means that if a natal man identifies as a Lesbian woman, then other Lesbians should regard "her" as a potential date, whether "she" has a penis or no. To do otherwise would be a denial of "her" identity, but the acceptance of "gender identity" with all of its erotic implications entails a jettisoning of the very concept of sexual orientation.

Thus, Lesbianism can't mean attraction to anatomical women because that would be transphobic. Gays can't say that they are attracted only to anatomical men because that would be tantamount to a denial of pre-op and non-op gay transmen's identities, and that would be transphobic. But the Lesbians and gays would thereby be denying their own identities. The LGBT Alliance is one big huge logical contradiction.

There is only one way to salvage the reasonableness of the LGBT Alliance: declare basic, rudimentary logic to be a religious tenet and, thus, impermissible to use in public discourse.