Sunday, June 26, 2016

June 26, 2016

It is now June 26, 2016, the one year anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges, arguably the most absurd Supreme Court Decision ever handed down. It is absurd for at least three reasons:

1) The decision rested primarily upon the Due Process Clause, which means that the state's refusal to regulate a relationship as a "marriage" is a deprivation of liberty. State regulation of anything is a constriction of liberty. It is blatantly contradictory and, hence, nonsensical to say that the refusal to constrict liberty amounts to a deprivation of liberty.

2) Obergefell mandates the listing of same-sex couples on birth certificates. It is CATEGORICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for two people of the same sex to make a baby. Justice Anthony Kennedy thereby declared rudimentary human biology to be unconstitutional.

3) Obergefell says that love is impossible without state recognition and thereby makes the state into the dispenser of what St. Paul calls the greatest of the three theological virtues. Thus, Obergefell establishes the state as the religion of love and thereby violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

Justice Anthony Kennedy is a demonstrable idiot.

(Yes, I am a homophobic bigot. The only way not to be a homophobic bigot is to be impervious to basic logic and basic biology, and the only way to do that is by way of a frontal lobotomy. I'd rather be a homophobic bigot than lobotomize myself. Got that?)

Friday, June 17, 2016

The New Calvinism

The LGBT Agenda is the new Calvinism in this sense. One wag famously described Calvinism as "damned if you do, and damned if you don't because there was no way to appease the whimsical Deus absconditus.

We have a parallel case with the LGBT agenda. There is no way to appease it. If you embrace heteronormativity, you are embracing the source of all that oppresses gays and Lesbians and are ipso facto a genocidal bigot, and if you reject heteronormativity, you are rejecting the only thing that can give transgender people an objective, public identity and are ipso facto a genocidal bigot. Therefore, you are cast into the outer darkness of bigotry if you accept heteronormativity, and damned to bigotry if you don't. The LGBT god is just as whimsical as John Calvin's.


Tuesday, June 7, 2016

What makes you a bigot?

It's time to update the "what makes you a bigot" list.

If you think women are by nature caregivers and men by nature warriors, you are a sexist, heterosexist, and, thus, homophobic bigot.

If you think it insane that men, just because they are more nurturing than aggressive, identify as women and vice versa, then you are a transphobic bigot.

And if you think these two statements contradict one another, then you are a bigoted simpleton in woeful need of an introductory gender studies class.

Got that? There will be a quiz.

What I learned today

The German for "Safe Space" is "Lebensraum".

Monday, June 6, 2016

I just have to spit this out

When you ask the LGBT lunatics why sexual dimorphism is not normative, they will point to the existence of intersex people. When you point out that the intersex condition is an abnormality, they will say that the incidence of having green eyes is a statistical abnormality as well, and yet no one considers having green eyes to be a disability. They thereby implicitly make the claim that the standards for physical normality are entirely social constructions.

Hence, blind people do not suffer from blindness, instead they suffer from society's irrational prejudice for sight. I do not suffer from cerebral palsy, instead I suffer from society's irrational prejudice for a fine motor agility, and so on and so forth. Physical normality is not anything that nature prescribes because nature is completely and utterly mindless. Fine. But medical science can't get off the ground without some notion of a natural normative standard for the human body. Otherwise, it becomes just an imposition of arbitrary prejudices. Social constructivism, the ideological puppet master behind most if not all of this LGBT nonsense, is really dangerous lunacy.