Thursday, June 27, 2013

Infallibilty


So, a child has no right whatsoever (not even a presumptive one) to know his natural parents and be raised by them. Otherwise, the law would have to recognize heterosexual relationships as normative in regard to the rights of the child, and that by Justice Kennedy's particular reasoning would only serve to demean the many gay and Lesbian couples who happen to be raising children. But a gay or Lesbian has a right to have a child even though they do not want to engage in the activity that Nature hath designated as the one that creates new human life. How the deuce does that work? I have said it before, and I'll say it again, the "logic" of same-sex "marriage" makes children into property.

A child has no right to know his natural parents and be raised by them, but a gay or a lesbian has a right to have a child? How the deuce does that work? And how the deuce is that NOT putting the interest of adults before the interests of children? And how the deuce is that not just absurd, but profoundly SICK and DEPRAVED as well? Oh, yes, I know, I am an irrational bigot. You don't have to talk to me. SCOTUS locuta est, causa finita est.

No comments: